A Montana Reject and Proud Raving Lunatic
A Montana Reject and Proud Raving Lunatic
I am going to stray a little into the political tonight.
The one and ONLY thing I can find some agreement with the current batch of republicans about, is the immegration issue.
Oh I know the liberal stance is amnesty. It is just that I happen to disagree with that stance. It is not that I want to see a bunch of people here illegally charged for their action of illegally entering this country. I don't really have a mean-spirited bone in my body, and revenge is not something I am comfortable with.
I am just a believer in enforcing the law of the land. If you want to stop illegal immegration,I believe the best way to approach it is to eliminate the reason people are illegally entering this country in the first place.
To do that, I think "employers" need to be held as accountable if not more accountable than the immegrants themselves. Employers entice illegals by providing them ILLEGALLY with jobs. Why do employers do that? Because of greed plain and simple. By encouraging and hiring illegals they have basically an unlimited supply of workers willing to WORK FOR LESS! This keeps the wages of the American people (citizens, middle class, you know .... yours truly, and our sons, daughters, and grandchildren) lower than they otherwise would be.
This is why Bush is so in favor of amnesty. Corporate, business people ... his base... are for amnesty. They do NOT want the law already on the books applied to THEM. It is not in THEIR interest to hold them accountable in a court of law.
Oh, I know the argument could be made that by allowing amnesty the democratic party most likely would be the benefactor of the resultant voting block. My argument is that the democratic party will also be the benefactor IF the law already on the books is upheld, employers are charged and convicted for hiring illegal aliens, and immegration is thus discouraged because jobs available to them will dry up. Wages for poor and middle class Americans will thus raise, and poor and middle class workers who have benefited from this increase in their wellfare will be primarily democratic voters anyway.
Amnesty benefits corporations plain and simple, and is not in the best interest of poor and middle class American workers, and therefore should not be encouraged or legislated by either democrats or republicans, for by doing so, they are encouraging or legislating breaking the law of the land which states that it is illegal for an employer to employ someone in this country without a green card.
End of argument! Wise up America ... and encourage lawmakers to force employers to obey OBEY the law of the land by holding THEM responsible and accountable when they break the law by hiring illegal aliens!
Later!
I am going to stray a little into the political tonight.
The one and ONLY thing I can find some agreement with the current batch of republicans about, is the immegration issue.
Oh I know the liberal stance is amnesty. It is just that I happen to disagree with that stance. It is not that I want to see a bunch of people here illegally charged for their action of illegally entering this country. I don't really have a mean-spirited bone in my body, and revenge is not something I am comfortable with.
I am just a believer in enforcing the law of the land. If you want to stop illegal immegration,I believe the best way to approach it is to eliminate the reason people are illegally entering this country in the first place.
To do that, I think "employers" need to be held as accountable if not more accountable than the immegrants themselves. Employers entice illegals by providing them ILLEGALLY with jobs. Why do employers do that? Because of greed plain and simple. By encouraging and hiring illegals they have basically an unlimited supply of workers willing to WORK FOR LESS! This keeps the wages of the American people (citizens, middle class, you know .... yours truly, and our sons, daughters, and grandchildren) lower than they otherwise would be.
This is why Bush is so in favor of amnesty. Corporate, business people ... his base... are for amnesty. They do NOT want the law already on the books applied to THEM. It is not in THEIR interest to hold them accountable in a court of law.
Oh, I know the argument could be made that by allowing amnesty the democratic party most likely would be the benefactor of the resultant voting block. My argument is that the democratic party will also be the benefactor IF the law already on the books is upheld, employers are charged and convicted for hiring illegal aliens, and immegration is thus discouraged because jobs available to them will dry up. Wages for poor and middle class Americans will thus raise, and poor and middle class workers who have benefited from this increase in their wellfare will be primarily democratic voters anyway.
Amnesty benefits corporations plain and simple, and is not in the best interest of poor and middle class American workers, and therefore should not be encouraged or legislated by either democrats or republicans, for by doing so, they are encouraging or legislating breaking the law of the land which states that it is illegal for an employer to employ someone in this country without a green card.
End of argument! Wise up America ... and encourage lawmakers to force employers to obey OBEY the law of the land by holding THEM responsible and accountable when they break the law by hiring illegal aliens!
Later!
posted by webegeeks | 1:15 AM
1 Comments:
I agree with you. God dwells within us, not apart from us. And its true, when I find myself having "bad feelings" against some one, those feelings come right back at me, times 10.
I pray for your recovery, my sister had that same operation about 5 years ago, Thanks God shes doing well. God Bless you.
Paula From the Bronx, NY
Post a Comment
<< Home